'Working Conditions of the Meat Industry\r'

'Recognition of the inherent gravitas and of equal and inalienable rights of all members of the hu publics family is the buns of freedom, rightness and peace in the world. Every star has the right to life, impropriety and the security of person. These few words pretty a great deal sums up the mission of the military personnel Rights observation post (HRW), an planetary non- organisational organization whose main focus is to catch the eudaemonia and the inherent rights to life that all human beings ar entitled to.\r\nBy using means much(prenominal) as the media for example, Human Rights Watch sets taboo to non only insure that all human beings constitute their lives with dignity precisely to in any case bring to justice those who, through merciless dictatorships, suppress the happiness and staple fibre human rights of their people. The purpose of this paper is to discuss my conviction on whether or non I concur with certain changes recommended by the HRW in regards to work guard when it comes to immigrant histrions. I will forget my opinion and enumerate some of the utilitarian and deontological considerations.\r\nIn 1906, Upton Sinclairs novel â€Å"The jungle” uncovered harrowing conditions inside Americas bosom back packing material plants and initiated a period of transformation in the nations warmheartedness industry. The Pure victuals and Drug Act and the federal official Meat Inspection Act were both passed posterior that year, and advertise organizations slowly began to improve the conditions under which the countrys warmness packers toiled. But some critics say Americas nerve chore has been in decline for decades and that the poor conditions ready in slaughterho drops and packing facilities today be often pocketable better than those described by Sinclair.\r\nThe Human Rights Watch was founded in 1978 as â€Å"Helsinki Watch” to validate and protect individual dissidents and independent citizen groups i n eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union. The aim was to typify the rights of suppressed writers, scholars, and intellectuals, and to ensure that their governments complied with the 1975 Helsinki Accords, which, among some other things, corroborate citizens’ rights to monitor the human rights practices of their own governments.\r\nThe first magnification came in 1981 when Americas Watch was established to demonstrate that human rights standards are universal and should be applied every bit to governments of all political stripes. The HRW group investigated the meat and domestic fowl industry’s unfair, unethical and inhumane practices and found that things needed to be changed. HRW recommended an assortment of things to change to acknowledge â€Å" newborn laws and policies should ensure respect for the human rights of immigrant workers, any(prenominal) their legal status.\r\nImmigrants should consecrate the same workplace protections as non-immigrants, incl uding coverage under fair labor standards and other labor laws, and the same remedies when their rights are violated” and â€Å" new-fashioned federal and state laws should quail line rush in meat and poultry plants and establish new ergonomics standards to reduce repetitive stress injuries. health and safety authorities should apply stronger enforcement measures. States should develop stronger worker compensation laws and enforcement mechanisms.\r\nThese changes were recommended because there is a massive influx of immigrant workers in the meat and poultry plants around the country. likewise a significant number of these workers are unwitting of their workplace rights. Many of these workers and their family are also undocumented and don’t want to draw economic aid to themselves. Because of their undocumented status, this prevents workers from empathiseking protection for their rights as workers from government authorities. The meat and poultry industry takes ad vantage of these fears and use it to their advantage.\r\nThey play on the fears of these undocumented workers to keep them in abusive conditions that violate basic human rights and labor rights. Regardless of someone legal status, no one deserves to work in unsafe filthy conditions. I do agree with the changes that the HRW put forth. I fool to agree that the illegal and some legal immigrant commonwealth are unfairly taken advantage of. The meat and poultry industry has the duty to protect and provide a safe working environment for their workers and also provide for damages or injury in the event of it happening regardless of legal status.\r\n about of the nations 17. 7 million immigrant workers toil, like those who preceded them, in jobs that native Americans refuse to do. They work as meatpackers, hotel maids, hamburger flippers, waiters, gardeners, seamstresses, takings and vegetable pickers, and construction hands. John Gay, a lobbyist for the American Hotel & Lodging Ass ociation, says there are places in this country where we wouldnt survive without immigrants, which is pressing Congress to supply more â€Å"essential workers” into the United States. The trend is to clitoris our own children into college to be rocket scientists or calculating machine programmers. But who is going to do these hard jobs that we have? Who is going to change bedpans in a nurse home? Or change beds in hotels? ” Jobs in poultry plants across the South, once held al nigh all by American b drops, are now rule by Mexican immigrants. Textile plants run for the most part on the labors of Hispanic workers. In the Kentucky coal fields, tap companies are considering recruiting miners from the Ukraine.\r\nFrom a Utilitarian perspective, requiring meat packing lines to slow down will increase man hours and reduce productivity. If chain speeds were legislatively mandated to be reduce by 25 %, the same plants which currently lack management commitment to safe v iandss would continue to bring on the same amount of contaminated food as it did prior to the forced simplification. The management would not be inclined to make changes which would cost money if they are losing money because of decreased production due to the reduction of the speed lines.\r\nThe meat and poultry industry does not promise rose-garden workplaces, nor should it be expected of them. OSHA offered special incentives to meat packers who entered into voluntary agreements with the agency to lessen their ergonomic hazards. magic spell they would still be subject to OSHA inspections, they would not be cited or penalized on ergonomic grounds. From a deontological stance, food safety is compromised when production lines move too chop-chop for its line workers to properly assess risks. Working in the meat and poultry industry is a sticky job that I stated before most Americans would not do.\r\nIt is the meat packing companies’ duty to ensure our foods and the workers who process them are as safe as they can be. If speed lines were bring down, health risks to employees will reduced and our meats can be properly assessed thus resulting in less contaminated meats making their way to out grocery stores. In conclusion it is obvious to see that rights and responsibilities were not carried out by the meatpacking industry. They were voracity driven business who â€Å"poisoned for profit” as hot seat Roosevelt said.\r\nThe meatpackers had a right to make their product but did not take the function to do it in a manner that was safe for the workers and the consumer. Thanks to the Human Rights Watch and people like Upton Sinclair and Theodore Roosevelt who was sickened after teaching an advance copy of Sinclair’s book called upon sex act to pass a law that established the Food and Drug Administration. The meat industry today takes the responsibility in making working conditions safer and producing meat safer for the consumer.\r\nRefere nces\r\nBlackwell, Jon. 1906: grumbling over ‘The Jungle’, retrieved 15 Jun 2011 from: http://www.capitalcentury.com/1906.html Meatpacking in the U.S.: Still a â€Å"Jungle” Out thither? (2006), retrieved 15 Jun 2007, from: http://www.pbs.org/now/shows/250/meat-packing.html Parker, Laura, USA just wouldn’t work without immigrant labor, (July 2001), retrieved 15 Jun 2011, from: http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/july01/2001-07-23-immigrant.htm\r\n'